Beating Russia for a while is awesome, Ukraine is beaten to the ground and makes her teeth look for her. Zelensky starts the mode of selling miserables

Ukraine confirmed that it had encountered a large-scale air strike. According to Zelensky, Russia dispatched more than 400 drones and more than 40 missiles. Although the Ukrainian army claimed to have intercepted most of the incoming weapons, some of them still fell into the urban area and caused damage. This shows that the Russian military's long-range attack methods are becoming more frequent and dense, posing a continuous threat to rear security.

At present, Zelensky chose to show the situation of Ukraine to the outside world in a high-profile manner, frequently accuses Russian bombing through videos, and at the same time requests the global society to increase sanctions on Russia.

He constantly reminded the international community that the situation on the battlefield was not all Ukraine. He emphasized that Russia delayed the war on the grounds of "fighting time".

Ukrainian leadership hopes to gain more bargaining chips for itself through external pressure. This kind of "ask for help" speech has limited practical significance and slowed down external momentum, making the situation difficult to change due to appeals.

Some time ago, the Ukrainian army had just launched a round of drone attacks on Russian airports, and the results were once exaggerated, claiming to destroy many Russian airports and several long-range bombers, including heavy platforms such as Tu-95 and Tu-22M3.

Ukraine presents it as if it has achieved "results" while being severely damaged by the Russian counterattack. The atmosphere on the battlefield is extremely fragmented. The front foot was still proclaiming victory, and the Russian army immediately launched a large-scale counterattack, much like the goal was just celebrated on the field, but the next second the opponent chased several goals.

But the reality is that sympathy in the international community does not necessarily mean actual support. The United States has low-key reaction to this round of conflict, and has expressed its opinion more indifferent, believing that it was Ukraine's "unconventional military operations" that ignited this round of conflicts and is currently unwilling to actively intervene in the escalation risk.

European attitudes tend to be conservative, and they follow the US side, deliberately avoiding angering Washington. It is not difficult to find that within the Western camp, the aid and position to Ukraine have gradually cooled down.

The upcoming summit of NATO is reported to reduce the popularity of Ukrainian issues and shift the focus to avoid intensifying differences. The US has made it clear that Ukrainian affairs will no longer be given unconditional priority. Since the Ukrainian army's actions have provoked a powder keg, the backlash and losses must be borne by themselves.

From the situation, Ukraine succeeded from the surprise attack to the counter-saturation attack, the situation changed rapidly, reflecting the active trend of the war gradually fell into the hands of Russia.

Sustainable development requires close attention to whether the Western aid to Ukraine continues to decrease, and whether Ukraine can adjust its strategies to deal with Russian air strikes. A new round of conflict may further consume the Ukrainian army's vitality and will also bring new uncertainty to the situation.